Skip to content

Conversation

@dnhatn
Copy link
Member

@dnhatn dnhatn commented May 8, 2025

This change provides more detailed status information for the TimeSeriesSourceOperator.

{
  "processed_slices" : 1,
  "processed_queries" : [
    "*:*"
  ],
  "processed_shards" : [
    "test"
  ],
  "process_nanos" : 13315249,
  "process_time" : "13.3ms",
  "slice_index" : 0,
  "total_slices" : 1,
  "pages_emitted" : 1,
  "slice_min" : 0,
  "slice_max" : 0,
  "current" : 0,
  "rows_emitted" : 6,
  "partitioning_strategies" : {
    "test" : "SHARD"
  },
  "tsid_loaded" : 1,
  "values_loaded" : 18
}

@dnhatn dnhatn added :StorageEngine/TSDB You know, for Metrics >non-issue labels May 8, 2025
@dnhatn dnhatn requested review from kkrik-es and martijnvg May 8, 2025 17:44
@dnhatn dnhatn marked this pull request as ready for review May 8, 2025 17:44
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-storage-engine (Team:StorageEngine)

@dnhatn dnhatn requested a review from nik9000 May 8, 2025 17:48
return new Status(this, tsidsLoaded, valuesLoaded);
}

public static class Status extends LuceneOperator.Status {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This probably deserves it's own little serialization test. I know it's kind of a pain, but it's helpful paranoia.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member

@nik9000 nik9000 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cool. good luck with CI

@dnhatn
Copy link
Member Author

dnhatn commented May 8, 2025

@kkrik-es @nik9000 Thanks!

@dnhatn dnhatn merged commit a3700ff into elastic:main May 8, 2025
17 checks passed
@dnhatn dnhatn deleted the time-series-status branch May 8, 2025 21:46
ywangd pushed a commit to ywangd/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request May 9, 2025
This change provides more detailed status information for the TimeSeriesSourceOperator.

```json
{
  "processed_slices" : 1,
  "processed_queries" : [
    "*:*"
  ],
  "processed_shards" : [
    "test"
  ],
  "process_nanos" : 13315249,
  "process_time" : "13.3ms",
  "slice_index" : 0,
  "total_slices" : 1,
  "pages_emitted" : 1,
  "slice_min" : 0,
  "slice_max" : 0,
  "current" : 0,
  "rows_emitted" : 6,
  "partitioning_strategies" : {
    "test" : "SHARD"
  },
  "tsid_loaded" : 1,
  "values_loaded" : 18
}
```
jfreden pushed a commit to jfreden/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request May 12, 2025
This change provides more detailed status information for the TimeSeriesSourceOperator.

```json
{
  "processed_slices" : 1,
  "processed_queries" : [
    "*:*"
  ],
  "processed_shards" : [
    "test"
  ],
  "process_nanos" : 13315249,
  "process_time" : "13.3ms",
  "slice_index" : 0,
  "total_slices" : 1,
  "pages_emitted" : 1,
  "slice_min" : 0,
  "slice_max" : 0,
  "current" : 0,
  "rows_emitted" : 6,
  "partitioning_strategies" : {
    "test" : "SHARD"
  },
  "tsid_loaded" : 1,
  "values_loaded" : 18
}
```
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants